Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Energy Community Solar topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Santa Fe County authorizes community‑solar subscription; aims to reserve credits for low‑income households
Summary
The board authorized the county manager to enter floating commercial subscription agreements with US Solar for state-awarded community‑solar projects in the PNM service territory, designating up to 55% of capacity for low‑income households and reserving a county anchor share that the presenter said would yield about $1.26M in net savings over 25 years.
Santa Fe County commissioners voted to authorize the county manager to enter into one or more floating commercial subscription agreements with US Solar (in partnership with Luna Solar) for community solar projects in PNM service territory.
Community Development Sustainability Manager Jacqueline Beam and US Solar representative Connor McCarthy detailed the offer: the developer will allocate a portion of each awarded project to low‑income households (US Solar proposes 55% of capacity to low‑income subscribers receiving deeper discounts) and offers anchor tenants — such as the county — a fixed 10% discount off the bill‑credit value assigned to their subscribed share. Connor McCarthy said the county’s portfolio of eligible meters would receive aggregated credits and that the subscription would require no county capital outlay or on‑site infrastructure changes. "You'll always receive 10% off of the credits that are applied to your electric bill," McCarthy explained.
Key figures and mechanics: US Solar presented estimated subscribed capacity of roughly 5.7 million kWh for the county accounts, with year‑one estimated savings of about $36,200 and a cumulative gross savings estimate of about $1.26 million over 25 years (assuming an admin charge, credit‑rate escalation and module degradation). McCarthy explained the county would primarily receive a 10% discount on credits; the absolute value of bill credits is set by PNM and reviewed by state regulators and will vary over time. He noted the developer models a 2.5% escalation in the bill‑credit value over time but cannot guarantee absolute dollar amounts.
Questions from commissioners focused on HIPAA/data flows, integration with reentry services, whether mutual/domestic water associations or tribally owned projects could participate, and what portion of county load the subscription would cover. Jail/health and reentry staff had earlier asked how the system would interface with medical records and Unite Us; presenters said clinical data would remain in an EMR and that sharing would be limited to non‑HIPAA fields, while reentry staff would continue manual referrals into the Connect/Unite Us case-management system.
Board action: Commissioner Kekari Stone moved to authorize the county manager to enter into floating commercial subscription agreements with US Solar that may include multiple subscriptions; Commissioner Hughes seconded. The motion carried. Staff and the developer said the county could be spread across multiple projects to avoid single‑project ownership caps and would be treated as an anchor tenant to preserve the low‑income carve‑outs and project stability.
What happens next: Manager Schaffer and Community Development staff said they will finalize subscription agreements with US Solar and return contract documents and purchase orders for the county manager’s execution under the board’s delegated authority.
