Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Comprehensive Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission narrows Urban Services Area expansion after cemetery and canopy-road concerns
Summary
After hours of public comment focused on Carr Cemetery and threats to canopy roads, the Leon County Commission voted to remove a contested 1,100-acre, single-owner parcel from a countywide Urban Services Area update and required future master planning and public notice for large developments.
A divided Leon County Commission on Tuesday scaled back a major proposed update to the countycomprehensive plan after residents and descendants warned that a broad Urban Services Area expansion could threaten historic cemeteries, canopy roads and require taxpayers to fund wide infrastructure extensions.
The boardopened a first-and-only public hearing on amendments to the land use and mobility elements of the Tallahassee-Leon County Comprehensive Plan. The community comment period ran for hours; dozens of residents, neighborhood groups and descendants of families buried at Carr Cemetery urged the commission to slow the process and to protect sensitive sites from development.
Craig Stevens, who said he is a direct descendant of people buried at Carr Cemetery on Bannerman and Meridian roads, told commissioners the countyhad already confirmed graves by ground-penetrating radar and that the site, "is one of the only physical connections I have to my great-grandmother and generations who came before me." He asked officials to "choose remembrance over erasure." Reverend Rebecca Dickey added that state law protects all human remains and that stewards must proceed "carefully and gingerly." Both cited the 2023 state law establishing a historic cemeteries program.
Speakers representing neighborhood groups and planning advocates raised related concerns about transparency, traffic and the fiscal impacts of bringing thousands of acres into the Urban Services Area. Vivian Young of 1000 Friends of Florida said recent changes surfaced only in the prior weeks and argued the amendments could legally obligate local governments to extend roads, sewer and other urban services.
County staff and several commissioners defended the proposed changes as planning measures meant to guide long-term infrastructure and require master plans before development. Staff described the planned-development land-use category as a tool that would make developers produce a master plan that identifies how natural resources and canopy roads would be protected and how transportation impacts would be mitigated.
The meeting produced a procedural turning point when Commissioner O'Keefe moved a substitute motion to accept the countywide update but to remove four parcels (about 1,100 acres) owned by a single owner along Old St. Augustine Road from the Urban Services Area expansion. The substitute would require that owner to seek an individual comp-plan amendment, which triggers 1,000-foot mail notice, parcel-specific analysis and multiple public hearings. Supporters of the substitute argued it preserved fairness and neighborhood notice; opponents said the countywide approach helps plan infrastructure proactively.
After extended debate the board approved the substitute motion in a roll-call vote recorded in the minutes (No: Commissioners Welch, Maddox, [transcribed as] Gaban; Yes: Commissioners Proctor, Cummings, O'Keefe, Minor). The substitute carried, narrowing the countywide change in the immediate action before the board and preserving the individual amendment route for the 1,100-acre owner.
The commission also agreed — during the Carr Cemetery discussion — to have county staff meet with cemetery descendants and the private landowner to explore protection options and next steps for preservation and access.
What happens next: staff will present the language and revised boundary positions to the City Commission (the Urban Services Area is a joint policy) and the owner could still apply for an individual amendment. Any future master plan or zone change remains subject to separate, public, noticed processes and additional votes.
Authorities and clarifications: County staff repeatedly told the board the current land-development code already requires conservation easements and access protections for recognized historic cemeteries; they also noted that the specific parcel at issue is private property and that the proposed master-plan pathway would not automatically change zoning or immediate densities without subsequent public approvals.
The boardended the item by instructing staff to return with precise parcel language for the record and to present the countyposition to the City Commission, which must adopt matching Urban Services Area boundaries for the change to take effect.
