Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Telecommunications Leasing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Supervisors authorize staff to counteroffer Verizon lease terms for courthouse tower

Crawford County Board of Supervisors · November 19, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Verizon proposed either a $140,000 lump‑sum perpetual easement or a new monthly rent of $1,075 with 10% increases every five years. County staff recommended a counteroffer (about $1,400/month); supervisors authorized staff to negotiate.

County staff presented a negotiated proposal from Verizon regarding the communications tower on county property at the courthouse. Verizon offered two options: (1) a one‑time lump sum payment of $140,000 in exchange for a perpetual easement, or (2) a new monthly rent of $1,075 beginning next month with 10% increases every five years and multiple renewal terms over 35 years.

Staff compared the proposal to the county’s current monthly payment (reported as about $1,641.82) and provided two models: an averaged counterproposal of about $1,378.41 per month and a practical suggested counteroffer rounded to $1,400 per month. Supervisors discussed uses of the tower fund (maintenance, equipment updates and a recent $100,000 transfer to EMA), noted the operational need to keep ongoing revenue for tower upkeep, and weighed the risk of a lump‑sum payment vs. a lengthy rent schedule.

Board direction: Supervisors supported staff negotiating a counteroffer on the monthly rent (staff indicated they would submit a $1,400/month counteroffer) and to review lease details (including remaining term and any early‑termination penalties) before executing any final agreement. Staff said they would update the board on negotiations.

Ending: Staff will deliver a counteroffer and return with recommended final language and financial analysis. No final lease amendment or vote was taken at the Nov. 12 meeting.