Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Ems Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Nottoway supervisors debate EMS funding, volunteer valuation and ordinance consolidation

Board of Supervisors of Nottoway County · November 21, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Emergency services chief Hyde presented safety-audit results and a plan to consolidate fire/EMS ordinances; board members debated costs of replacing volunteers with paid staff, decal/pass-through funding, and creating capital funds for equipment amid consideration of a levy to fund EMS.

Emergency services chief Hyde gave a wide-ranging report that included safety audits, a planned Dec. 22 school reunification drill, mutual-aid discussions, and what he described as a valuation of the county’s volunteer emergency responders.

Hyde said volunteers add significant value: referencing an 85‑volunteer baseline and a salary study average of $65,000, he presented a hypothetical replacement cost in the millions if volunteers were replaced by paid staff. “If we pay them what the average is in the salary study...that is $5,500,000,” he said, then discussed lower-cost scenarios and a narrower staffing proposal: “17 is 1.5 mil,” he told the board when discussing how many paid personnel would be required to provide continuous coverage.

The board also discussed decal revenues and state pass-through funds (for example, 4‑for‑life payments), with finance staff confirming the pass-through money still comes from the state and that FY25 decal receipts totaled about $188,552. Administrative staff and supervisors agreed that ongoing capital needs for trucks and equipment will likely require a dedicated plan in the next budget and that levy proceeds may need re-evaluation to support capital and staffing needs.

Hyde proposed consolidating earlier ordinances into a single emergency-services ordinance to clarify responsibilities and mutual-aid relationships, including language about Fort Pickett that may need future revision. Board members expressed concern about unintended effects on small volunteer departments and discussed incremental staffing options (placing a few paid firefighters at key stations) to preserve volunteer fire departments while stabilizing EMS coverage.

No formal levy vote occurred at the meeting; the board tasked staff to follow up during budget planning and to consider targeted capital funds for equipment purchases.