Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners debate fireworks-sales changes; ordinance fails and is sent back to committee
Summary
The commission considered an ordinance to move temporary fireworks sales from June 29 to June 27 and to allow customers who enter by 10 p.m. to complete purchases; fire officials warned of inspection and overtime costs and the board voted down adoption but sent the item back to public works and safety for further work.
The commission took up an ordinance amending Chapter 15, Article 4 to change temporary fireworks-sales rules. Delaney Longachandra of the Unified Government legal department said the proposal would "push that start date back 2 days to June 27" and would relax the 10 p.m. hard sales stop so customers who entered before 10 p.m. could finish purchases.
Fire officials and commissioners focused debate on safety, staffing and enforceability. Captain Barton Richardson of the Kansas City, Kansas, Fire Department described the logistics of "firework season," including site approvals, inventory checks, extinguisher and egress requirements and nightly closing inspections. He said the department typically fields five daily inspectors and that the work is time-intensive; inspectors sometimes work 14-hour days during the season. "It would be a lot more than a bit of an issue," Richardson said when asked about softening the 10 p.m. stop and added overtime costs could be managed but likely ought to be borne by stand owners rather than county taxpayers.
Commissioners raised specific concerns: several said the ordinance’s language allowing a "reasonable time" after 10 p.m. for customers who entered before the cutoff is vague and could be interpreted differently by stand operators across the city. Several members suggested a hard stop or clearer, enforceable language, and asked whether permit fees cover overtime costs. Fire staff estimated the incremental overtime for two extra days could be "somewhere north of $10,000," and legal staff said revocation of licenses for violations is permitted under current code.
After extended discussion, a motion to adopt the ordinance failed on a roll call. The board then voted to send the ordinance back to the Public Works and Safety standing committee so staff can rework the time/soft-close language, review enforcement and confirm whether permit fees adequately cover additional inspection costs.
