Soil & Water Conservation district asks for county funding; committee debates whether extension is statutorily required
Loading...
Summary
The Hancock County Soil & Water Conservation District presented its work and requested county consideration for reinstated funding; committee members debated whether the University of Maine Cooperative Extension is statutorily required to receive county funds and whether nonprofits should be handled via the grant program.
The Hancock County Soil & Water Conservation District asked the advisory committee to recommend reinstating county support after the district last received Department 17 funding in 2023.
David Deprein, who identified himself as board secretary, gave a five‑minute presentation describing the district’s conservation work, grant reliance and two part‑time staff. Deprein said the district would seek the same level of funding it received in 2019 and reiterated that the organization provides technical services, lake‑association grants and shoreline erosion work.
A committee member raised a legal question about county obligations to the University of Maine Cooperative Extension, saying internet/AI research indicated statute authorizes counties to levy a tax for extension services but does not mandate county funding. The member said: "It states that statute 7, chapter 7 of the Maine revised statutes, a county is authorized to levy a tax to support the local extension office. However, they do not have to fund them." Staff (Speaker 9) responded that the county had previously believed it had a statutory obligation and pledged to research whether the law has changed.
Union Cooperative Extension representative Sue Baez told the committee that a Maine Extension Act from 1914 exists and recommended staff check that statute for current applicability.
Committee members debated process: some said the advisory committee’s role is to review the commissioners’ budget and offer advice rather than introduce new programs; others said the grant program established for nonprofits could be the equitable route for funding. A motion to advise the commissioners to include the Soil & Water Conservation District in Department 17 was moved and seconded but failed on a committee vote.
The committee directed staff to research statutory language on the Cooperative Extension and report back; no formal county funding change was adopted during the meeting.
