Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Revaluation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Somerset County officials explain revaluation, warn of "sticker shock" and overlay effects
Summary
County staff described a recent revaluation that bundled multiple years of market growth into a single update, raising both land and building valuations; commissioners pressed on how state rounding, overlays and educational-service allocations raised Somerset taxpayers' share despite little change in the county budget.
County staff detailed why property tax bills in parts of Somerset County rose after a recent revaluation, saying the assessment reflected several years of market growth applied in one update.
"We often refer to it as the sticker shock because it's multiple years of inflation that happens in one shot," Speaker 2 said, explaining the office separates land and building values, uses national construction-cost guides to set replacement cost, then applies depreciation based on condition.
The presentation noted the unorganized territory (UT) mill rate has three components: county services, state services (the same across UT counties) and a county tax portion. Staff said the state-services portion this year was $2.13 per $1,000 of taxable value and that Somerset’s county-service and county-tax components were roughly $1.95 and $1.43 respectively, producing a total rate near $5.69 after rounding and overlay rules were applied.
Commissioners pressed staff on implications for local taxpayers. Speaker 1 said the county’s budgeted tax commitment rose only slightly — from about $8.1 million last year to about $8.3 million this year — but the automatic overlay produced roughly $245,000 in additional taxes tied to the revaluation. "So the only increase to taxes for Somerset County's budgets this year was over there," Speaker 1 said.
Staff explained the overlay is computed as part of the UT rate-setting process and is used for the unorganized-territory education fund and for abatements when needed. Commissioners discussed whether legislative change is necessary to alter how tree-growth reimbursements and overlays are handled, noting the UT does not receive the state tree-growth reimbursement that towns do.
The session also reviewed how tax-exempt holdings affect local assessments. Staff said tribal land that is federally designated as tribal land in the UT is exempt from property tax; they also discussed federal holdings and payments in lieu of taxes (PILT). Speaker 1 cited federal PILT payments as a significant statewide contribution and suggested the commissioners could pursue federal advocacy.
The county said it adjusted non-taxed property values in the recent revaluation and that, because nonprofit and conservation holdings' values also rose, those higher values can indirectly raise assessments on other taxpayers when the tax base shifts.
The commissioners did not take a policy vote but asked staff to pursue follow-up information on tree-growth reimbursement, overlay accounting, and options for legislative change. The administrator said he had testified to a legislative task force on property tax relief and planned ongoing engagement with state officials.
