During public comment a resident asked the board to reconsider removing the meeting camera, saying video provided transparency and citing view counts of "over a 180" and "over a 140" for recent meetings. The resident suggested changing meeting times so people who work 9‑to‑5 can attend and see deliberations. "Camera shows facial expressions. Camera shows who says what, when they say," the commenter said, arguing video offers fuller context than minutes alone.

The same speaker also pressed the county for a concrete plan to address statute violations noted in the 2024 audit and raised concerns about missing quarterly reports and other compliance items. The resident asked for multi‑year auto bill reports and said they would keep returning until a plan was produced.

Responding, commissioners and staff said work is underway to address treasurer‑office issues and audit findings, that the effort is in progress and that a fuller vote and discussion could occur once a third commissioner is present in January.

Why this matters: Transparency practices (video streaming) and audit compliance affect public trust, open‑meeting access and the county’s legal obligations under state statutes. The resident’s request underscores community interest in both access to meetings and fixing audit‑identified statutory violations.

Board action and next steps: Commissioners acknowledged the concern, said they are working on remedial steps for the treasurer’s office and suggested waiting until the next meeting in January (when a full board is expected) to take a final vote on camera operations.