Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Lake Darling Resort topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents and planners press county over Lake Darling Resort expansion; board approves plat but tables resort uses
Summary
County planning staff presented a preliminary plat to expand Lake Darling Resort; the planning commission tabled a companion conditional-use permit after DNR raised stormwater and docking concerns and dozens of residents urged the board to withhold approvals until detailed plans and parking, safety and shoreline impacts are resolved. The board approved only the plat action with conditions.
Planning staff presented a two-part proposal from Lake Darling Resort seeking to expand the resort by about 5.5 acres and to add uses including a meeting room, restaurant and docking. County staff told the board the planning commission recommended approval of the preliminary plat with two staff conditions but tabled the conditional-use permit, which would be needed to allow resort-related uses on the new parcel.
The project drew detailed environmental and safety scrutiny. Staff said the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources warned that existing impervious-surface coverage appears out of compliance, that earlier stormwater controls installed in 2016 are not fully operational and must be rectified, and that additional docking should be set back from the channel with the fewest tie-up slips possible. Staff recommended docking be sited at least 100 feet from the mouth of the tributary to avoid a known deep hole used for swimming and heavy recreational boat traffic.
Commissioners asked how pedestrian crossings and winter safety would be handled on County Road 22, which has a blind hill and limited foot-traffic infrastructure. Staff described mitigation proposals that were part of the conditional-use review: an extended sidewalk to the bridge, a flashing beacon (RRFB) crosswalk, on-road signage and painted road messaging such as “crosswalk ahead,” plus potential traffic-calming measures and coordination with the county engineer and sheriff.
Public comment was strongly negative. Scott Dalsas, a Lake Darling resident who said he and roughly 40 attendees at a recent land meeting opposed the plans, told the board, “not 1 supported this project.” He said the applicant provided no architect’s drawings, no clear building size or parking plan, and that the resort has been out of compliance on impervious-surface issues since initial construction. He warned that a small site could be converted into a bar or nightclub and increase noise, boat traffic and safety hazards for homeowners and swimmers.
A commissioner who chaired the planning meeting said the CUP was tabled specifically because the applicant did not provide size, parking or docking plans; the commissioner said staff asked the applicant to return with detailed drawings showing square footage, parking locations, pedestrian routing and any docking plans. Several other residents at the planning commission meeting, staff noted, likewise expressed opposition to expansion due to traffic and shoreline impacts.
The board emphasized that the preliminary plat action is administrative: approving the plat permits subdivision and recording but does not authorize resort uses. With that limitation, the board moved and approved the preliminary plat to combine and plat the parcels with the conditions recommended by staff. The conditional-use permit remains tabled and will return to the planning commission for additional information before the board considers resort-related uses.
What happens next: staff will seek the additional materials requested by the planning commission (detailed building/parking layouts, stormwater remediation actions and final docking plans) and coordinate with DNR and the county engineer on traffic and shoreline protections before the CUP is scheduled again. The board did not approve any resort uses at this meeting.
