Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Opioid Settlement Grants topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Douglas County splits opioid-settlement grants after board debate; five projects approved, two tabled
Summary
The board debated recommended opioid-settlement grant awards and, after a failed initial vote on the full slate, approved a narrowed set of projects while tabling others amid questions about budget allocations and program details.
Ann Steen, speaking for Horizon Public Health, presented recommendations from an interagency grant review process for distributing opioid-settlement funds held by Douglas County. The packet listed recommended awards including Bridgeway Career Learning ($55,764), Car Care ($110,000), Douglas County Jail ($68,447.89), Solutions Behavioral Health ($146,360), Unity Recovery ($10,000), West Central Community Action ($35,000) and Lakes Area Pride ($4,000).
Commissioners asked how the recommended amounts were allocated and whether specific line items (for example, Car Care salary vs. vehicle repairs) could be adjusted. Steen said the applications had been reviewed by a regional group and a local screening committee to ensure reporting and eligibility, and that the recommendations were limited to funds currently in the county's possession.
An initial motion to approve the entire recommended slate failed on a roll-call vote. The board then moved to approve a subset of projects: Bridgeway Career Learning, the Douglas County Jail project, Solutions Behavioral Health, Unity (United) Recovery, and West Central Community Action; Car Care and Lakes Area Pride were removed for further review. That motion carried.
Commissioners raised questions about oversight and program outcomes: several members expressed concern about the Car Care proposal's high salary share and asked whether more funds should support vehicle acquisition or repairs rather than salaries. Staff explained that many vehicles are donated and that the award allocations reflected committee negotiation; commissioners suggested tabling contested items to obtain revised budgets or additional documentation.
The board also asked staff to monitor grant end dates and ensure reporting requirements are met. Several commissioners noted the settlement funding stream could continue for many years; staff said the original expectation was distributions over an 18-year period.
