Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget Administration topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lincoln council reallocates final ARPA funds: $50,000 to downtown beautification, remainder to Placer County conservation credit tool
Summary
Council approved using remaining American Rescue Plan Act funds to seed the Downtown Lincoln Association with $50,000 for beautification and to place $182,777 with the Placer County conservation program as an economic-development credit to encourage select large projects.
The Lincoln City Council on Dec. 9 approved the final distribution of remaining American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds, seeding $50,000 to the Downtown Lincoln Association (DLA) for downtown beautification and allocating about $182,777 to a credit/reserve with the Placer County Conservation Program (PCCP) intended as a modest economic-development tool.
Staff said the city has used ARPA funds strategically over the past four years for public safety, technology, business and nonprofit assistance, parks and arts. With under $200,000 left, council members discussed whether $25,000 was sufficient for downtown efforts; council ultimately voted to increase the DLA allocation to $50,000 by shifting funds from the subsequent item.
The remaining funds will be placed as a credit the council could activate for a future project it views as an "immense public benefit" — for example, to help offset environmental-mitigation costs developers face on large greenfield projects. Staff said the Placer County program’s executive director indicated the approach could work and that a preliminary memorandum of understanding has been circulated for review.
Randy Johnson, representing the DLA, told the council the seed money will allow the association to launch visible downtown projects and help foster more public participation. The council combined the two ARPA items for a single vote and carried the motion by voice vote.
Council members noted legal constraints on direct gifts of public funds and described this approach as a limited incentive tool rather than a large subsidy.
