Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Redistricting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Currituck County reviews three six‑district maps, agrees to take preferred plans to public hearing
Summary
Currituck County commissioners reviewed three proposed six‑district redistricting maps, heard that census-block indivisibility and a handful of large blocks constrain compactness, and agreed to present preferred options at public hearings; no map was adopted during the session.
Currituck County commissioners and staff reviewed three proposed six‑district redistricting options and agreed to take preferred plans to public hearings after more public outreach and a follow‑up work session.
The presentation, led by a presenter identified only as Blake in the record, summarized why options B and C had been rejected and why the board asked staff to produce six‑district plans. Blake said census blocks cannot be divided and highlighted population imbalances that drive map choices, noting, “census blocks are the most granular unit and they cannot be divided.” The presenter also corrected an earlier slip, saying a particular block contains about 1,200 people, not 12,000, which limits compactness in some map alternatives.
Why it matters: the new districting will determine which residents vote in which district and affect the timing of elections for incumbents. Blake said the new District 6 would absorb much of the county’s recent growth in East and West Moyock and would add roughly 4,600–4,700 people as a new district unit. The Courthouse precinct was described as roughly 115% of an ideal district population, requiring the removal of about 470 people to reach balance.
Board members discussed three closely related maps labeled D1, D2 and D3. D1 keeps many precincts unchanged while putting a new District 6 where growth is concentrated; D2 is similar but swaps district numbering to keep certain incumbents in their preferred‑numbered district; D3 produces less compact shapes and drew less support. Blake summarized trade‑offs between compactness, split precincts and incumbency, and said none of the options paired incumbents who plan to run again. The record also notes the District 2 incumbent has said she will not seek reelection.
Caroline, who spoke to next steps, asked the board to decide which map or maps to take to public hearing and said the board could either select a plan afterward by resolution or send the maps back for further work. "Next steps would be to decide which of these you want to take to a public hearing to get some public input on," Caroline said. The presenter reminded members that interactive maps remain available at the previously distributed URL.
The board asked staff to e‑mail side‑by‑side comparisons of the favored options (for clarity during public outreach) and scheduled an additional work session, proposed for the 17th, to finalize the materials before hearings. No formal motion or vote adopting a map occurred during the session.
The meeting also included a personnel announcement: the chair said Troy Braithwaite will be sworn in tonight to fill Commissioner Etheridge’s Moyock (District 5) seat while Etheridge is on leave; the length of Braithwaite’s service was not specified.
Next steps: staff will circulate side‑by‑side map comparisons and post interactive maps; the board will hold public hearing(s) on selected plan(s) and may return with a resolution selecting a final plan after public comment.
