Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Wildfire Recovery topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Lincoln County reviews wildfire recovery: 300 homes lost, multiple programs and unfinished needs remain

Lincoln County presentation · June 14, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A county presenter summarized recovery from the September 2020 Echo Mountain fire, describing a 'bucket' funding approach that used ARPA and state aid for septic, wells, roads and housing, and warned that case management and debris removal remain urgent gaps.

Unidentified Speaker, identified in the transcript only as the presenter, told attendees that Lincoln County lost roughly 300 homes in the September 2020 Echo Mountain fire and about 2,500 acres burned. “We lost 300 homes,” the presenter said as they reviewed aerial imagery showing the burn zone and recovery progress.

The presenter framed recovery as distinct from response and described it as a multi-year effort. Citing FEMA’s definition, they said long-term recovery typically takes two to seven years and that the county was approaching its fourth year. The presentation focused on both what was done and how decisions were made—intended as a knowledge transfer so future leaders are not starting from scratch.

Why it matters: funding windows are closing even as many households still face barriers to rebuilding. The presenter warned that remaining needs—particularly hands-on case management and debris removal—will determine whether households complete recovery.

County leaders relied on a pragmatic “bucket” approach to funding: prepare to capture dollars when specific funding streams are available and avoid multi-year planning that misses those windows. The presenter said CARES Act and American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) money were the largest near-term buckets and that ARPA proved flexible for infrastructure work such as wells, septic systems and water treatment.

What was delivered: the county stood up a septic and well inspection and replacement program (primarily ARPA-funded) within about nine months and reported completing 253 septic projects and 10 well projects in the Otis area. The county partnered with OSU Extension to provide technical expertise and contracted contractors to perform the work.

Housing and community supports included federal and state-funded projects. The presenter said the Housing Authority of Lincoln County’s Wicombe Place will provide 44 affordable units and is scheduled to open in June 2024, with wildfire survivors given first right of refusal. Depot Bay Townhomes, a state-funded 12-unit rental project, is in permitting. A 12-unit tiny home village led by Northwest Coastal Housing is proceeding under state funding, and the county donated tax-foreclosed lots to local nonprofit developers, including Habitat Humanity, to build additional homes.

The county also financed non-housing supports: reimbursing Panther Creek Community Center and Salmon River Grange for utilities so they could operate as one-stop resource centers; funding childcare stipends for survivor children at Lincoln City Rec Center and Kids Zone; paying for a trauma-informed summer camp; and deploying county mental-health response workers in Otis.

Infrastructure challenges remained pronounced. Roads were “single-handedly the most challenging piece of recovery,” the presenter said, because FEMA requires proof (photos) that roads were damaged during the fire. The county helped secure $500,000 from a state Lawnmower Fund (ODOT-related) to regravel several public-access and road-district roads; one road still awaits resurfacing pending further federal funding.

What’s left to do: the presenter said the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) round expected to arrive may be the last large funding opportunity and emphasized the need to hire or contract a disaster case manager. They described prior case management as largely provided by state agencies and Catholic Charities and said many survivors were denied FEMA assistance because they could not complete required paperwork—arguing for a more hands-on, intensive case-management model.

The presenter closed by urging continued advocacy for federal funds for manufactured-home replacement and homeownership opportunities and by thanking community partners, volunteers and survivors. “Recovery is truly a team effort,” they said.

Next steps: ongoing grant close-outs, continued advocacy for federal money, targeted case-management hiring, debris and defensible-space work, and moving remaining CDBG infrastructure projects forward.