Whitley County BZA renews brewery’s special exception with noise, waste and operation conditions
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
SubscribeSummary
The board reapproved a special exception for a South Whitley brewery to process off‑site agricultural products, imposing conditions on noise, refuse enclosure, health‑department compliance and hours. Supporters described the taproom as an important local 'third place.'
The Whitley County Board of Zoning Appeals voted Dec. 23 to reapprove a special exception for the brewing operation at 8324 West State Road 14, allowing continued processing of agricultural products not produced on‑site. The approval included seven staff‑recommended conditions addressing refuse screening, a 50‑decibel noise limit at adjacent residences, health‑department compliance, hours for brewing operations, and maintenance of an 8‑foot privacy fence.
Staff reviewed the case history: an initial 2022 special‑exception approval, a 2024 rezoning to Village Commercial and a 2024 amendment attempt. Planning staff said many earlier taproom‑specific conditions were superseded by the rezoning but recommended a set of conditions focused on brewery impacts such as parking, noise and enclosure of waste containers. Attorney Jackson Beck and petitioner Jason Esterline described the operation as a small, farm‑oriented brewery producing roughly five to seven barrels per month in recent years and using 400–800 pounds of grain monthly for off‑site inputs; deliveries are small and infrequent.
Several residents and business supporters urged approval. Matthew Staton and Paul Scheffler described the taproom as a community hub and economic multiplier for South Whitley. Board members asked specifically about wastewater from cooling operations; Esterline explained the cooling water is clean well water and said, “That is literally just water,” and added that the operation can route liquids to a holding tank if required by health authorities.
After discussion, the board approved the special exception with conditions 1–7 as presented by staff. The vote was 4‑1 in favor.
