Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Local Governance Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves consent agenda and adopts ordinance moving weights-and-measures; several administrative items carried or introduced
Summary
The Hudson County Board approved the consent agenda, introduced an ordinance establishing dedications within county parks, and adopted an ordinance transferring weights-and-measures to the law department; questions were raised about trust‑fund usage, RFP scoring and a future pilot resolution on a healthcare tax.
At its meeting, the Hudson County Board of County Commissioners approved the consent agenda and recorded votes on several ordinances and administrative items.
The board approved routine consent-agenda items by voice/roll call without separate debate. An ordinance to establish dedications within county parks was introduced (first reading) and recorded as introduced. The board then held a public hearing and Q&A on an ordinance amending the Hudson County Administrative Code pursuant to NJSA 40:41A‑1 to move weights and measures from the sheriff’s office to the law department. After questioning, commissioners voted on final adoption and the ordinance was adopted by recorded affirmative votes from Commissioners Ponte Lipsky, Vasilis, Cedeno, Cicelli, O’Dea, Rodriguez, Walker and Chairman Romano.
During discussion members asked whether the weights-and-measures trust fund revenue would remain restricted to weights-and‑measures uses. Frank Alonzo, superintendent of weights and measures, said the trust balance is used for equipment, vehicles and things other than staffing; he estimated annual registration and fine revenue between roughly $200,000 and $250,000 and said the current trust‑fund balance is about $718,500. He added that staffing is paid via the county budget and not from the trust fund.
Separately, a commissioner moved to amend and place a new resolution (item 18) on the agenda and said he plans to bring a fuller resolution at the next meeting proposing a pilot program that would require certain apartment developers or dwellers to pay a health care tax to create recurring revenue; discussion on the specifics was deferred to a future meeting.
Commissioners also discussed concerns about RFP scoring on a separate selection, noting vague staffing descriptions and requesting more rigorous reviewer practices, resumes for proposed staff and clearer scoring criteria for future procurements. The board adjourned after additional business and follow‑up actions were assigned to staff.
