Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Burn Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Richmond County staff urge relying on Virginia law for sawdust-burning risks rather than a new local ban
Summary
Planning staff told the commission that Virginia Code § 10.1-1144 already requires cleaning distances around mills and allows liability for suppression costs; staff recommended outreach and possibly citing state law in local language instead of a new punitive local ordinance.
Planning staff presented possible approaches to reduce fire and environmental risk from sawdust piles and sawmills, and suggested the county rely on existing state law rather than create a new, detailed local burn ordinance.
"That is the state law, section 10.1-1144," staff member Hope said when describing state requirements. "All mills should be cleaned for a distance of 50 yards in all directions... the premises must be cleaned a 100 feet around sawdust piles to eliminate sparks... Violations can lead to fines, and if a forest fire originates from such a violation, the responsible party is liable for suppression cost."
Hope told the commission most other localities the county reviewed either rely on state code or note the state code in local ordinance language to give the county enforcement 'teeth.' She recommended distributing an informational flyer to new sawmill owners and holding in-person outreach with communities that commonly operate sawmills.
Commissioners discussed enforcement practicalities, noting volunteer-firefighter response limitations and the difficulty of retrofitting established sawdust piles to meet setback guidance. Staff also said the county has met with Amish and Mennonite families and would continue outreach as a first step before pursuing changes that could be difficult to govern or enforce.
No formal ordinance change or vote was taken; staff framed the options and asked for direction from the commission.
