Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Social Services Csa topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County's recovery court praised as cost‑saving; CSA private placements drive overruns
Summary
Officials told the board the recovery/drug court program saves jail costs and returns participants to the community, while mandated CSA spending on high‑cost private placements and long‑term parent‑aid contracts produced a substantial multi‑hundred‑thousand dollar overspend that staff said must be tackled through the Community Policy and Management Team.
Recovery/Drug Court and social‑service leaders told the board their programs produce strong outcomes and significant savings but face escalating costs in mandated areas.
Recovery Court staff said participant fees and grant funds support incentives and program services and estimated the program avoids substantial jail costs because most participants avoid incarceration. "This program saves you probably several $100,000 a year," a recovery court official said, describing the program’s success rate and value.
By contrast, county social‑services leadership warned that CSA (Community Policy and Management Team) spending for intensive private placements and long‑term parent‑aid services increased sharply — one speaker said parent‑aid line items rose from roughly $135,000 in 2020 to $658,000 last year, a the board described as a multi‑hundred‑thousand‑dollar increase that produced a county shortfall. Staff said 30 cents on every dollar of CSA costs is locally borne and that the board may need to pursue tighter review controls through the FACT (family assessment) and CPMT processes to limit long‑term expenditures.
Supervisors asked social‑services staff to continue efforts to bring high‑cost children back to therapeutic local placements when clinically appropriate and to provide the board with options to reduce CSA exposure without violating mandated service obligations.
