Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Comprehensive Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Powhatan planners review 'economic priority' map and consider adding motorsports as a conditional use
Summary
Planning staff presented proposed 'economic priority' and 'economic opportunity' land‑use designations and discussed adding 'motorsports' as a conditional use in the agricultural district; commissioners raised questions about parcel selection, minimum parcel sizes, utilities and noise before scheduling additional hearings.
At the Nov. 5 meeting the Powhatan County Planning Commission reviewed staff recommendations to add a new 'economic priority' future‑land‑use designation and to add 'motorsports' as a conditional use in the A‑10 agricultural district. Planning Director Lisonbee Webb said the economic‑priority label is intended to identify infrastructure‑ready parcels for light industrial, technology and logistics uses that would support the county’s long‑range fiscal target to shift the tax base away from heavy residential reliance.
Webb described three strategic designations in the plan—gateway business, economic opportunity and industrial—and said the economic‑priority proposal converts some gateway business parcels to a light‑industrial/employment focus. Commissioners asked how the CWG (citizens working group) selected parcels (vacant or underdeveloped criteria), raised concerns about parcels that contain solar farms or houses, and questioned whether designating land as economic priority would produce development without clear utility capacity or marketing plans.
On the motorsports question, staff proposed adding motorsports as a conditional use for large A‑10 parcels to accommodate outdoor facilities such as go‑kart tracks, motorcycle events and similar activities. Commissioners said the draft definition was broad and asked whether the county should specify minimum acreage, noise controls, and other standards to limit off‑site impacts. Webb said the matter will come back as a public hearing at the December meeting for more detailed public review.
Commissioners also debated tradeoffs between mapping more acres for future economic uses and focusing on making existing industrial parcels more marketable. Several members urged parcel‑level review to avoid mapping residences or solar installations as targets for industrial uses. Staff stressed the future‑land‑use map is a long‑range policy tool and that parcel feasibility and utility availability will be part of subsequent case‑by‑case review.
The commission set a schedule to continue comprehensive‑plan discussions at subsequent meetings and indicated the motorsports addition would proceed to a public hearing in December for detailed standards and community comment.
No formal changes to the comprehensive plan or zoning were adopted on Nov. 5; commissioners requested additional analysis and public review before any map or ordinance changes are advanced.
