Scott County council rejects immediate 3% across‑the‑board raises, adopts baseline salary ordinance; schedules department review

Scott County Council · December 31, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council debated a proposed countywide pay increase on Dec. 30 and rejected motions for an immediate 3% across-the-board raise (with and without elected officials). It adopted a baseline 2026 salary ordinance and set a Feb. 1 deadline for department-by-department raise proposals and potential back pay.

Scott County councilors on Dec. 30 considered but declined to approve an immediate 3% pay increase across the board. After extended debate about fairness, fund availability and statutory limits on elected-official pay, the council adopted a baseline 2026 salary ordinance and asked staff to return with a department-level plan by Feb. 1, 2026.

Staff presented cost estimates for a permanent percentage increase: 1.5% roughly $98,533; 2% roughly $131,377; 2.5% roughly $164,002; 3% roughly $197,065. Councilors disagreed about inclusion of elected officials and departments that had received raises in 2025 (for example, EMS and highway staff). An initial motion to grant 3% to all employees, including elected officials, failed after members opposed giving pay increases to elected offices retroactively.

A follow-up motion to grant 3% to county employees but exclude elected officials and EMS also failed. Several councilors said they supported raises for long-overlooked hourly staff, but they wanted a more granular, department-by-department approach rather than a single percentage applied universally. One councilor said the bottom rung of county employees has not had a raise in three years and urged a targeted approach.

The council then approved a standard salary ordinance for 2026 (ordinance 2026-001) as a starting point and separately passed an ordinance addressing elected-official compensation consistent with state statute (ordinance 2026-002) with no change in elected pay. Council members agreed to hold workshops and to produce a historical set of salary ordinances (2021–2025) and a pay-comparative study by HR consultant Shealy Wagner. If councilors approve raises after the Feb. 1 review, staff said any back pay would be issued as a lump sum for January.

What’s next: Auditor and HR staff will compile department-level salary histories, benchmark data and budget impacts for a Feb. 1 council decision. The council set a process-oriented deadline rather than immediately changing compensation.