Councilors spent substantial time on development rules after residents flagged a flooding issue in a new parking lot. Staff said the city first adopted design standards in April 2021 and expanded them in June 2024 to add an appendix describing required engineering plans and drainage measures; staff said the updated standards require flood studies and on‑site detention where appropriate and that engineering corrections are expected to go to bid in January.

On parks and plan developments, council members disagreed about requiring full park construction before issuing residential building permits. One council member recommended relying on development agreements with trigger points (for example, after a set number or percentage of building permits are issued) so the city does not assume premature maintenance responsibility or excessive upfront costs. Another member warned that land dedicated to the city as parkland for “municipal purposes” can constrain future use without an election, and that language of dedication and development agreements should be chosen carefully.

City Attorney Terry Welch briefed the council on a draft sign ordinance developed in the wake of a Supreme Court decision limiting content‑based regulation. Welch said courts require cities to regulate signs by type (monument, temporary, inflatable, etc.) rather than by message and noted practical complications in policing signs located just outside city limits in the ETJ. Staff recommended further research and a trip to review on‑the‑ground signage and to consult the county; the council asked staff to return next month with findings before adopting an ordinance.

Council requested that staff follow up on the specific flooding instance, proceed with the planned engineering bid, and draft development‑agreement language that specifies park dedication and improvement triggers, rather than an across‑the‑board pre‑build requirement.