Public commentator urges closer board oversight of $52M construction/CTE project, alleges scope creep
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
Subscribe
Summary
A public commenter told the board it must scrutinize a $52 million construction/CTE project, alleging contractor and administration incentives to expand scope and urging the board not to act as a 'rubber stamp' for design and cost increases.
During the public‑comment portion of the January 5 study session, a speaker identified in the transcript as Mr. Fitzpatrick raised a lengthy critique of the district's construction planning for CTE and related work, saying the community faces decisions about "spending $52,000,000" and urging the board to reassert oversight.
The commenter alleged that scope growth — including an added 15,000 square feet — was driven by the administration and the general contractor (named in the transcript as Crabtree), who the speaker said have financial incentives tied to project size. "Any scope creep for them is cash of the bank," the speaker said, and urged the board to ask why added classrooms and square footage were included and whether enrollment forecasts supported that expansion.
The speaker told the board it had delegated too much authority to administration and consultants, saying the board voted 8–1 to not demand detailed cost bases and that, as a result, the general contractor had not provided the promised briefings. The commenter urged members to consider delaying added classroom construction until enrollment growth materializes.
Board leadership acknowledged the comments and accepted public questions later in the session about specific line items (for example, construction testing and inspection) and pledged to validate estimates. The transcript records no formal board response or vote on the construction scope during the study session; the remarks were part of public comment.