An unidentified speaker at a brief hearing in the Municipal Court of Providence said he would appoint his son, who 'is an attorney,' to represent a defendant's daughter and then discussed an apparent conflict of interest that led to an excusal.

The speaker said, "this is my son, is here tonight and he is an attorney. . . . I'm going to appoint him as your attorney and have him represent your daughter," adding, "I don't know how skilled he really is, but we're gonna find out." The same speaker later said he would excuse himself from relying on another participant, stating, "I'd have a conflict of interest if I had to rely on you, so I just wanted to . . . I will. Oh, you're out." The transcript contains no record of a formal courtroom vote or a written order confirming a formal appointment.

In the same exchange, another participant (identified in the transcript as Speaker 2) laid out what they described as mitigating facts for the person referred to in the transcript as Miss Cook. Speaker 2 argued that Miss Cook "was appropriately driving the speed limit, especially in inclement weather," and said she "did not accelerate" through a yellow light. "Her focus on driving safely and not accelerating . . . I think she'd be rewarded and she should be given the benefit of the doubt," Speaker 2 said.

There is a brief, partly unclear discussion about timing and road conditions, with references to "1 tenth" and "in excess of the water," and a remark that Miss Cook had offered a related excuse earlier and appeared shy that day.

The transcript concludes after the exchange; it does not record any formal judicial ruling, a written appointment order, or a vote on counsel. The statements recorded are limited to the speakers' remarks during the hearing.