Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Appointments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Supervisors debate conservation board appointments and potential conflicts of interest
Summary
A supervisor questioned the county's practice of annual reviews for conservation-board appointments, saying state law calls for five-year terms and that ex-officio supervisor seats create ethical conflicts; the board agreed to place the issue on a future agenda for legal review.
During the appointment portion of the meeting a member of the board (Speaker 4) raised concerns about how Louisa County has handled conservation board appointments. Speaker 4 said the positions should be five-year appointments and expressed that appointing sitting supervisors as ex officio members and redoing appointments annually appears contrary to state law. Speaker 4 also said private citizens typically submit applications describing a demonstrated interest in conservation and argued the practice should be consistent for citizen appointees and supervisors alike.
Speaker 2 acknowledged the concern and said staff would put the question on the next agenda and seek an opinion from Adam Parsons (County Attorney or staff counsel referenced) before the next meeting. The board then moved to approve the current slate of appointments as presented and carried the motion by voice vote, while agreeing to follow up on the legal question.
The transcript records this as a substantive procedural question rather than a final legal determination; the board did not change appointments during the meeting but directed staff to research whether past practice conforms to statute.
