Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Greenwood council approves three redevelopment-area measures on second reading
Summary
The council approved Resolutions 25-22, 25-23 and 25-24 on second reading, designating or enlarging three redevelopment economic development/allocation areas and approving related orders; all passed 9-0.
The Greenwood Common Council on Jan. 5 approved three redevelopment-related resolutions on second reading that designate or enlarge economic development areas and associated allocation areas.
Corporation Counsel read Resolution 25-22 (Redevelopment Commission Resolution 2025-05), which designates the Greenwood North State Road 135 economic development area, creates an allocation area and approves a related economic development plan and order. Councilmember Hopper moved adoption; Councilmember Manchin seconded. The council passed Resolution 25-22 on second reading by a 9-0 roll-call vote.
Corporation Counsel next read Resolution 25-23 (Redevelopment Commission Resolution 2025-06), enlarging the Greenwood Eastside Economic Development Area and the Arlington Farms allocation area. That resolution, sponsored by Campbell and Hopper, likewise passed on second reading by a 9-0 roll-call vote.
Finally, Corporation Counsel read Resolution 25-24 (Redevelopment Commission Resolution 2025-07), enlarging the Greenwood Versatile Road allocation area and removing certain residential properties from that allocation area; Hopper sponsored the measure. Council approved Resolution 25-24 on second reading 9-0.
The transcript records the council's procedural votes and the sponsorship of the measures but does not include substantive debate, amendments or the specific dollar amounts tied to the approved plans. Corporation Counsel identified the referenced redevelopment commission resolution numbers when reading each measure into the record.
The council concluded these items without additional public testimony recorded at this meeting; any plan details, financial obligations, or project timelines were not specified in the meeting transcript and may appear in associated redevelopment commission documents or future staff reports.
