Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Residential Architecture Standards topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Denison planners outline residential architectural standards; P&Z hearing set for Jan. 13
Summary
Planning staff presented proposed residential architectural standards that would require facade articulation, limit repeated elevations, set minimum roof pitch and overhangs, and impose parking and ADU design rules; the Planning & Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing Jan. 13 and, if recommended, the council may act Jan. 20.
Phyllis Jarrell of City Centric Planning presented proposed residential architectural standards to the Denison City Council on Jan. 5, saying the rules aim to help infill development blend with existing neighborhoods while encouraging a variety of housing types. “For single family, duplex, triplex, and quadruplex, were focusing on building articulation,” Jarrell said, explaining a builder would be required to choose three architectural features (porches, brackets, dormers, bay windows and similar elements) to add variety to facades.
Jarrell told the council the package covers multiple building types and includes several specific requirements: allowing garages to extend up to 3 feet in front of the facade in some cases to avoid flat frontages; a proposed minimum roof pitch of 4:12 and minimum overhang of 1 foot (with limited exceptions for very steep roofs); rules to avoid repeating the same elevation across many lots; a requirement that at least one ADU building material match the primary house; and a rear‑parking requirement for triplexes and quadruplexes. For multifamily buildings, Jarrell said walls longer than 40 feet would need recesses or projections and each building should incorporate two architectural features such as balconies or awnings.
Jarrell also described amenity thresholds tied to unit counts: one playground for developments of 50 or more units and one swimming pool for 100 or more units, plus an option for developers to choose from a list of amenities. She emphasized staff had met with local builders in December and incorporated feedback intended to avoid placing Denison “out of step” with nearby cities.
Councilmembers asked several clarifying questions. An unidentified councilmember asked whether the city had discussed minimum house widths tied to lot size; Jarrell and planning staff responded they had not proposed minimum widths, noting that existing lot widths, setbacks and easements (and a 5‑foot minimum side yard per the building code) already shape house footprints. A question about sidewalks was answered by staff stating sidewalk requirements are governed by the subdivision ordinance rather than the architectural standards.
The Planning & Zoning Commission is scheduled to hold a public hearing on the case on Jan. 13; if the commission recommends approval, the measure would be considered by the council on Jan. 20.
