Moore Speakeasy ADLS amendment advanced to full commission pending curb‑cut agreement

Carmel Plan Commission Committee · January 7, 2026

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee reviewed a 12-foot addition and mid-century-modern exterior changes for the Moore Speakeasy at 904 W. Main St. Staff said the addition reduces a drive lane and petitioners must secure a written connection agreement with the adjacent Signature property or reduce the addition; the committee forwarded the item to the full planning commission.

Architect Bruce Barry presented a mid‑century‑modern redesign and a 12‑foot west‑end addition for the Moore Speakeasy, showing transom alignment, composite panels and updated facade elements meant to unify the tenant space with adjacent Boneyard elements.

Rachel Kiesling (planning) warned that the 12‑foot addition reduces a drive lane used for circulation to roughly 18 feet from 31 feet; the petitioner proposed an exit connection into an existing one‑way drive on the adjacent Signature property to preserve circulation. Kiesling requested written authorization from Signature's owners before approving the addition; absent that authorization, she said the addition would need to be reduced to preserve drive-lane width and meet safety standards.

Property owner Kevin Paul told commissioners he would continue coordination with Signature ownership and that a smaller addition (8 feet) is an available fallback if a curb‑cut agreement is not obtained. Technical and fire reviews are logged on the building permit and will be reconciled prior to final approvals, staff said.

Commissioners discussed parking, driveway circulation, design elements and the trade-offs between preserving drive-lane width and allowing the addition. The committee agreed to forward the ADLS amendment to the full planning commission for Jan. 20, with the expectation petitioners supply a curb‑cut agreement from Signature or submit a reduced‑addition design.

Staff planned to continue coordination with the petitioner and to review final TAC/fire comments and any written agreements before the full planning commission vote.