Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Moreno Valley council pauses new logistics development after public outcry over MOU and truck impacts

January 07, 2026 | Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Moreno Valley council pauses new logistics development after public outcry over MOU and truck impacts
Public criticism of the World Logistics Center and unanswered questions about a city MOU led the Moreno Valley City Council on Jan. 6 to impose a 45-day moratorium on new logistics and industrial development while staff and council review design standards and pending plan changes.

Multiple public speakers accused the city and developers (naming Highland Fairview and the World Logistics Center) of failing to deliver promised workforce-training outcomes, not providing requested public records and shifting infrastructure costs onto taxpayers. Christopher Baca and other residents said they had filed public-records requests seeking the MOU and related documents and alleged the city did not release the materials they requested. George Hague and several Northeast residents told council that areas proposed for higher-density zoning lack sewer, sidewalks and adequate evacuation routes and warned of substantial truck traffic tied to large warehouse projects.

Councilmember Bernard proposed the 45-day moratorium, citing the upcoming general-plan update and ongoing negotiations with the California Attorney General’s office; the motion was seconded and passed unanimously. City Attorney Steven Quintanilla earlier noted the council would continue several closed-session personnel items to the next meeting and that one potential litigation matter required no reportable action.

City Manager Bridal Mohan and staff explained that the city historically authorizes the city manager to execute amendments within previously approved not-to-exceed budget amounts to avoid project delays; they said larger or out-of-scope costs would return to council. Council directed staff to use the moratorium period to review development standards, confirm infrastructure obligations in existing agreements and clarify public records responsiveness.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2026

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal