Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hewitt details $158,722 Warren Park upgrades including pavilion, restrooms and playground
Summary
City staff presented completed and planned Warren Park work: a 40x60 pavilion, stainless-steel park restrooms, toddler playground, utility lines and future plans including a soccer field and multi-sport court. Staff reported a total cost of $158,722 and noted significant in-house labor and one donation.
Get email alerts on the Parks topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Scott Coleman and parks staff presented an overview of completed improvements and future plans for Warren Park during the council workshop.
Coleman described a new pavilion and associated site work: a 40-foot-by-60-foot concrete slab with reinforced rebar and perimeter beams; a framed steel building with awning area and roll-up doors; stainless-steel fixtures in vandal-resistant restrooms with automated faucets and epoxy floor coating; and a center bay for plumbing and storage. He said much of the dirt work and utilities were completed by city staff.
Coleman provided a line-item estimate for work completed: concrete slab, $52,400; metalwork and framing (building dimensions and interior finishings) and trade work (exact breakdown in packet); electrical service and wiring $34,000; water and sewer lines $7,218; stainless-steel restroom fixtures and valves $10,775; partitions and ADA equipment $5,445; a donated barbecue pit and picnic tables; playground equipment for toddlers $7,478; fence and rubber mulch and miscellaneous supplies. He listed a grand total of $158,722.
Staff also outlined future projects for Warren Park: enlargement of pond areas, additional irrigation and water fountains along the adventure trail, a nature-themed playground for older children, a planned soccer field and a possible multi-sport court configured to accommodate basketball, tennis and multiple pickleball courts. Coleman noted the park board prioritizes canopies and shade, but acknowledged canopy costs remain a limiting factor.
Council members praised staff work and noted the in-house labor reduced costs substantially; one councilor estimated that replacing staff labor with contractors could have pushed the project above $200,000. No formal vote was required for the informational presentation; staff said they would return to the council for any future funding decisions.

