The Scott County Board of Commissioners approved a consent agenda at its Jan. 6 meeting that bundled a series of routine but substantive items into a single motion. The consent package (items 7.1–7.16 as read into the record) included:

- Adoption of the 2026 County Board meeting schedule and operating rules (Resolution 2026-1).
- Appointments of commissioners and officials to boards and committees (Resolution 2026-2).
- Approval of multi-year agreements: a three-year agreement with Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. for the Sheriff's Essential Employee Correction Officers Unit, and a three-year agreement with the Scott County Attorneys Association (Resolutions 2026-3 and 2026-4).
- Authorization to use the county website as an alternative to the official newspaper for transportation project solicitations (Resolution 2025-5 as read in the package).
- Authorization to enter agreements with the Minnesota Department of Transportation for County Highway 23 and County Highways 68 roundabout project and final payment to Eureka Construction, Inc. for County Highway 69/78 roundabout work (Resolutions 2026-6 and 2026-7).
- Acceptance of assistance and entry of a grant agreement with the State of Minnesota for preparation of a federal discretionary funding application for Trunk Highway 13 mobility impacts (Resolution 2026-9).
- Authorization to retain Bolton & Menk, Inc. for the Southwest Metro River Crossing flood resiliency study and a cooperative agreement with Carver County for that study (Resolutions 2026-10 and 2026-11).
- Other routine items, including a service agreement with Great Lakes Management Company, a reappointment to an advisory committee and standard payroll and personnel processing approvals.

A motion to approve the entire consent agenda was made and seconded; the board approved the package by voice vote. Several items in the package relate to transportation infrastructure and flood resiliency work and will involve intergovernmental cooperation and consultant agreements; staff follow-up on implementation steps and contract execution was referenced but not detailed in the meeting record.

The consent vote was recorded as carried; the transcript does not include a roll-call showing individual commissioner votes or detailed funding amounts for each agreement in the record. Members of the board did note library ribbon-cuttings and other community events elsewhere in the meeting.