Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Graffiti Abatement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Casper councilors push to move long-pending graffiti abatement program forward

City Council (work session) · January 6, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council members said the city’s graffiti abatement program has lingered on priority lists for years and discussed moving it up, pursuing nonprofit partnerships and creating dedicated graffiti spaces; staff said the executive team believes action could happen sooner than five years.

Council members at a Casper work session said the city’s graffiti abatement program has been on council lists for years and urged staff to bring a concrete plan back to the body.

At the meeting, Speaker 3 said the graffiti abatement program “has been on there since my…5 years,” noting the item’s long residence on tracking lists and asking whether the city can advance the work. Speaker 4 said they were unaware the city had a graffiti abatement program and asked staff to clarify the program’s scope and options, including the idea of installing dedicated graffiti spaces in partnership with a nonprofit. Speaker 1 asked whether the council could “put some guardrails on that.”

The executive team, represented in discussion by Speaker 3 and Speaker 1, indicated the city could move faster than the previously stated five-year timeline; Speaker 3 said the team thought it could be completed “sooner than 5 years,” and Speaker 4 suggested it could be done within the next two years.

Council members pressed for specific follow-up steps: clarifying what the existing program does, whether it includes enforcement or cleanup authority, what funding or nonprofit partners would be required, and whether a pilot of dedicated graffiti spaces would be feasible. No formal motion or vote was recorded on the item during the session.

The council did not set a firm date for a staff report but several members volunteered to follow up and asked staff to place the item higher on future agendas. The exchange concluded with a request for staff to provide clarifying details about program authority, timeline and potential partners.