Winona County approves CETA contract for economic‑development services amid debate over cost per loan

Winona County Board of Commissioners · January 5, 2026

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board approved a professional‑services contract with CETA to administer the county’s revolving loan fund and provide one day per weekeconomic‑development capacity. Commissioners questioned administrative costs per loan, municipal participation, and whether in‑house staffing would be more efficient.

Winona County commissioners approved a contract with CETA to provide economic‑development professional services tied to the county’s revolving loan fund (RLF), despite questions about administration costs and declining municipal partners.

Ross and other staff explained that the county’s RLF—initially capitalized after the 2007 floods—has about $900,000 outstanding in active loans. Commissioners calculated rough administrative costs per loan (estimates during debate ranged near $10,000 per closed loan when all overhead is considered). Commissioner Vaguely and others asked whether municipalities pulling back their participation reduces program value and whether the county should consider bringing the function in‑house or changing the contract scope.

Staff noted that CETA’s role includes both loan processing and active promotion so that banks and borrowers know the RLF is available; they also said DEED rules limit fund flexibility and that any repurposing would require approval. The board approved the CETA professional‑services contract and asked staff to return with options on cost‑reduction, use of the RLF and whether the program should be brought in‑house if municipalities continue to withdraw.