Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Appeals panel examines whether Leatherwood’s competency finding was stale at trial

Judicial - Appeals Court Oral Arguments · January 7, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Defense argued that nearly four years elapsed between a 2018 competency opinion and the 2022 trial, leaving the competency finding stale and requiring renewed inquiry into the defendant’s ability to consult with counsel; the Commonwealth said recent hearings, expert testimony, and records supported the trial judge’s ruling.

Appellate justices probed whether a competency finding from 2018 remained reliable by the time of trial in Commonwealth v. Jerome Leatherwood.

Ethan Stiles, arguing for Leatherwood, told the court that the only expert opinion finding competency dated from 2018 and that intervening events (placements at recovery facilities, transfers, COVID-era disruptions, and changes in…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans