Senators asked for follow-up studies and agency testimony to fill knowledge gaps identified in opening remarks.

Senator A (unnamed) flagged a transportation-support study tied to changes in Act 250 and said VITRANS currently lacks a formal role when towns permit new development, producing a gap that the study is intended to address. "That gap is in, again, not just funding, but it's also in how the system works," she said.

Senator A also urged more detail on state land assets used by businesses and said the state should require fair payment when assets are used commercially.

Separately, Senator D (unnamed) reported constituent complaints about GMT cuts to an O&D program affecting Colchester riders and suggested GMT or the agency present to the committee.

The chair warned about a parallel health risk: "By this time next year, 45,000 people could be losing their Medicaid coverage," he said, and urged coordination with Health & Welfare to understand impacts on rural medical transport.

Next steps: committee staff will request detailed studies on Act 250 permitting roles, asset-management scenarios, invite GMT to explain service cuts, and seek Health & Welfare input on medical-transport demand tied to Medicaid coverage changes.