Members told the committee safety should guide its work and requested outside testimony on enforcement and automated tools.

"I would like us to take some testimony on enforcement," Senator C (unnamed) told colleagues after describing a recent wrong-way-driving incident in her district. She urged the committee to invite the Governor's Highway Safety Council to present statistics and to explain why a previously proposed automatic traffic law enforcement pilot (work-zone and red-light/speed cameras) did not proceed at the Agency of Transportation.

Senator A (unnamed) framed pedestrian safety as a priority and said she will introduce a bill aimed at driving-school programs for young drivers. "I would like to start with safety first," she said.

Senator B described bipartisan interest in tougher measures for repeat dangerous drivers and described a "super speeders" concept modeled on ignition-interlock devices that would limit vehicle operation for high-risk drivers.

Members signaled they also want law enforcement present to discuss enforcement resources and whether decisions made after criticism of traffic stops shaped enforcement levels. "I would like law enforcement in because people are doing that," one senator said, arguing enforcement is core to public safety.

Next steps: committee staff will seek testimony from the Governor's Highway Safety Council, Agency of Transportation staff, and law-enforcement representatives; Senator C said she will file a municipal-option bill for automatic enforcement.