Residents urge preservation and alternatives for Telephone Hill as assembly weighs demolition bids
Loading...
Summary
Multiple residents testified during public participation urging the assembly to slow demolition on Telephone Hill, winterize vacant houses to preserve options, and consider 'concept D' infill alternatives that would reduce demolition, retain historic fabric and create local housing opportunities.
Several residents used the public‑comment period at the November 17 Juneau assembly meeting to press city leaders to slow demolition plans on Telephone Hill and pursue less‑destructive alternatives.
Catherine Fritz, an architect, urged the assembly to consider an "infill" approach (she referenced a concept D discussed at a Fairbanks architects conference) that would integrate new housing while preserving historic structures rather than wholesale demolition. Larry Talley asked the city to winterize vacant Telephone Hill buildings — drain water lines, keep minimal heat, maintain exterior lights and police patrols — so options remain open if demolition bids come in too high.
Other commenters expressed frustration that public preferences were not being heard. Carol Bookless questioned a reported $5 million demolition cost versus an asserted $3 million property value and said voters feel ignored. John Ingalls, a former Telephone Hill resident, urged restoring restorable houses and adding small housing such as garden apartments. Bruce Simonson presented petition results urging a slower, measured approach and recommended forming a working group and protecting assets by maintaining heat and utilities until decisions are finalized.
Those speakers asked the assembly to preserve historical character and seek alternatives that balance housing needs and stewardship. The assembly heard the testimony during the public‑participation slot; no formal vote on Telephone Hill occurred at this meeting.
What’s next: The assembly continues to develop demolition bid documents; public commenters asked for a 60‑day review of potential alternatives and formation of a stakeholder working group.
