Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Legislative Update topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Town hears pre‑legislative briefing; lobbyists warn rural designation unlikely
Summary
Town lobbyists told the Loxahatchee Groves council that a rural designation is unlikely under current Commerce Department standards and urged the council to pursue funding requests carefully; council adopted its legislative agenda 5–0 to send to Tallahassee.
Rhonda Brown of Ronald Del Book P.A. and Sam Peltier of the Pittman Law Group told the Town of Loxahatchee Groves council at its Jan. 6 meeting that this week marks the start of the annual legislative sprint in Tallahassee and highlighted several measures that could affect the town. Brown said the Department of Commerce“feel[s] based on the statutory requirements for a rural designation that Loxahatchee Groves does not meet the standards,” meaning projects that depend on a rural designation would likely require a 50% local match if the town cannot obtain the designation.
The consultants reviewed a legislative package that includes proposals to modify the post‑storm development rules created by last year’s SB 180 and a separate bill intended to give more authority back to local governments. They also described a rural renaissance bill and a local fireworks preemption measure that the town delegation has signed onto. Peltier said leadership turnover this year — both House and Senate leaders will change — makes outcomes uncertain and could reshape which proposals move forward.
After the briefing, councilors debated which items to prioritize. On a motion, the council approved the town’s legislative agenda as amended, 5–0, directing the lobbyists to press the requests that night’s packet identified and to report back on progress while the session runs. The packet asks the delegation to sponsor stormwater and control‑structure resiliency projects and included cost‑share language the town must consider if rural designation is not granted.
Council members said they appreciated the early guidance and noted the need to stay flexible: if the state places constitutional amendments on the ballot, implementation could require additional legislative work in the year following a vote. The lobbyists advised staff to wait on some code or ULDC changes until the legislature clarifies how it will revise SB 180’s restrictions.
