Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Resident questions demolition of historic 'The Sport'; city manager says inspections and state law drove permitting decision

Livingston City Commission · January 7, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A resident asked who authorized demolition of the historic building known as 'The Sport.' City Manager Grant Gager said an internal staff review and on-site inspections showed structural problems and noted recent state law removed demolition permit decision-making authority from citizen historic-preservation commissions.

During general public comment, resident Rusty Trespass asked the commission to explain why the front of a historic building known locally as "The Sport" was torn down and whether public consultation preceded the demolition.

"I'm concerned about the decision making processes that allowed for the complete removal of that structure," Trespass said, asking which elements of the original building would be retained and whether a committee or city body was involved in the decision.

City Manager Grant Gager responded that he spoke with the building inspector and observed the property. He said the roughly 130-year-old structure was constructed without a concrete foundation and that wood timbers were laying on dirt. As demolition began the owner and staff identified additional problems; an internal committee of building and planning staff and the city manager’s office reviewed photographs and on-site inspections and authorized demolition. Gager also explained that the Montana Legislature recently prohibited citizen historic-preservation commissions from making binding determinations on demolition and design permits, which changed the permitting process for historic structures.

Gager said staff understands that some historic elements will be incorporated into the new design and that he had reviewed interior designs the owner submitted, but he acknowledged that "no replacement and no substitute for history" fully replaces an old building and sympathized with the public concern.

What happens next: City staff and the property owner will proceed with the permitted work; public commenters seeking additional details about preservation elements or permit records may contact the city manager’s office for further documentation and permit files.