Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Madison County denies some rezones after public safety, access and plan consistency concerns; approves several family lot splits
Summary
Madison County commissioners denied four rezoning requests for being inconsistent with the comprehensive plan and approved four other rezones (including family lot splits and tract partitions) after Planning & Zoning recommendations and public hearings.
Madison County commissioners on Jan. 6 voted to deny a group of rezoning requests and approved a separate slate of rezonings after public hearings and Planning & Zoning recommendations.
A motion to deny items 1–4, which staff said had been tabled from prior meetings and which Planning & Zoning had recommended denying, carried after commissioners said the proposed changes were inconsistent with the county’s comprehensive plan. Commissioner Adams moved the denial; Commissioner Chandler seconded. The board recorded that the motion carried; the transcript does not include a full roll-call tally in the record provided.
Separately the board approved Item 5, a request from Brooke and Samuel Francis to rezone a 4-acre portion of a 27.33-acre parcel at 61653 Vineyards Creek Church Road (Map 5, Parcel 42 in District 4) to allow a mortgage-driven split. Planning & Zoning recommended approval 5–0; no members of the public opposed the rezoning at the hearing. Commissioner Kirk moved to approve and Commissioner Chapman seconded; the board approved the item.
Item 6 (Marcus and Deborah Hale) and Item 7 (Kyle Wood, applicant for Beverly Freeland) likewise received Planning & Zoning 5–0 recommendations and were approved by the board. Item 6 rezoned approximately 16 acres into two tracts for the owners’ purposes after commissioners confirmed an easement provides legal access. Item 7 rezoned roughly 36.8 acres to permit division into 4-acre tracts.
Item 8 (Adam Swan), a request to rezone 4.4 acres of a 15.16-acre parcel to create additional road frontage, drew detailed public opposition. Mike Sales (1176 Floyd Road) and other residents warned the proposal was inconsistent with the comprehensive plan, cited alleged inaccuracies on the applicant’s plat, raised concerns about septic and driveway feasibility, and estimated substantial culvert and road upgrade costs (a public commenter cited a culvert estimate of about $80,000 and suggested county upgrades could approach $1,000,000). After public comment the board voted to deny the request; the motion to deny carried according to the transcript.
What happens next: denied rezoning requests remain off the table unless reapplied; approved rezones will be processed per county procedures. The transcript does not include the final certified vote tallies by named commissioners for each item.
