Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

House advances bill allowing trained optometrists to perform three in‑office laser procedures; bill headed to finance

January 08, 2026 | House of Representatives, Committees , Legislative, New Hampshire


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

House advances bill allowing trained optometrists to perform three in‑office laser procedures; bill headed to finance
The New Hampshire House on Thursday adopted a committee report as amended on House Bill 349, which would permit credentialed optometrists to perform three specified in‑office laser procedures after meeting training and credentialing requirements.

Supporters said the change will expand access to care, particularly in the state’s North Country and other areas with limited ophthalmologic services. Representative Long and others noted long waits and provider shortages and argued that authorized optometrists could safely perform the procedures after completing required training and case experience.

Opponents — including multiple physicians and several House members — warned that optometrists are not physicians and stressed the difference in surgical training for ophthalmologists. Representative Woods told colleagues that lasers are surgical instruments and said "allowing optometrists perform procedures with lasers poses significant risk to patient safety." Critics argued that complications may require immediate surgical rescue and that the proposed credentials and minimum case counts in the amendment fall short of ophthalmologic surgical training.

The House adopted the committee report as amended by roll‑call vote and the bill was sent to the Finance Committee for budgetary consideration. The adopted floor record includes new informed‑consent language and credential verification requirements added during floor amendment debate.

Why it matters: The bill addresses the tension between access to care in underserved regions and maintaining surgical training and safety standards. Proponents emphasized pragmatic access concerns and training pathways; critics highlighted scope‑of‑practice risks and urged stronger safeguards.

What comes next: HB 349 proceeds to the Finance Committee for fiscal review; sponsors and opponents both signaled further technical and statutory work will be needed in committee and rulemaking to define credentialing and oversight.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep New Hampshire articles free in 2026

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI