Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
House debates expanded insurance coverage for continuous glucose monitors; committee report recorded as adopted
Summary
Lawmakers debated HB 6 48 on whether insurers should be required to cover continuous glucose monitors more broadly. Supporters called CGMs 'game changers' for early diabetes management; opponents cautioned about unclear clinical criteria and premium impacts. The committee report on interim study was recorded as adopted on the floor.
Lawmakers on Thursday spent extended floor time debating House Bill 6 48, which would broaden insurance coverage for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices.
Supporters, including Representative Teresa, described CGMs as a “game changer” and said updated clinical guidance from the American Diabetes Association supports earlier use of the devices beyond insulin‑dependent patients. Proponents argued that earlier access could…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
