Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Administration topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Reviewers discuss town manager powers, removal threshold and role clarity
Summary
The commission reviewed Article 6 and debated the threshold to remove the town manager, due‑process protections and whether operational specifics should remain in contract rather than the charter; counsel and the town manager recommended leaving many details to contracts and procedures.
The Charter Review Commission reviewed Article 6 and held a substantive discussion on the town manager’s appointment, duties and removal process.
The draft reiterates that "the town manager shall be the chief administrative officer of the town" and lists typical managerial duties, including hiring and supervising town staff and preparing annual administrative reports. Commissioners raised whether the removal threshold in the draft—affirmative vote of at least three members of the council—should remain or be changed to require a majority or supermajority. One commissioner argued for a supermajority to prevent abrupt, politically driven removals; others said a simple majority is standard in practice.
Town counsel advised that many practical procedures (appointment, interview procedures, employment terms) are outlined in contracts and the council’s procedural rules and cautioned against over‑specifying the charter where a negotiated contract may better address specifics. The town manager said his contract and job description provide needed flexibility, but agreed to provide the commission with copies of relevant contracts and job descriptions for review.
The commission did not adopt changes at the meeting; members asked staff to provide contract language, examples from other municipalities and recommended revisions to the draft removal and due‑process language for further consideration.
