Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Wetlands topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Cheektowaga EAC recommends transit-site parking and pavilion despite wetland-buffer concerns

Town of Cheektowaga Environmental Advisory Committee · January 7, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Town of Cheektowaga Environmental Advisory Committee voted to recommend a transit-site amendment that adds parking and a gazebo near an existing dog park, while noting outstanding New York State DEC review and concerns about impacts to the wetland buffer.

The Town of Cheektowaga Environmental Advisory Committee voted to recommend an amended site plan for a transit facility that would add parking stalls and a gazebo shelter near the town dog park, forwarding the committee’s recommendation to the town board for final action.

Committee members heard that the applicant sought additional parking and a small pavilion behind the dog park and that the application had been referred to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and the town traffic safety committee; no written comments from DEC had been returned to the town at the time of the meeting. Chair (unnamed) summarized the change as “additional parking here, here, here, and then the gazebo here” and noted the referral status.

Members raised environmental concerns about placing the pavilion and expanded parking in or near a regulated wetland buffer. “I know the big concern was the the wetland buffer in the rear,” Chair (unnamed) said during the discussion, and another member added that dog-park runoff and uncollected waste can reach the wetland and therefore deserved attention. Several members said the site’s swales and drainage must be confirmed before building permits are issued.

After discussion the committee moved to recommend the amended plan to the town board; the motion passed by voice vote.

The recommendation is procedural: DEC review remains outstanding and the town retains authority through building-permit decisions. The town board will consider the EAC recommendation and any subsequently received agency comments before issuing local approvals.