Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Administrative Reorg topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners debate procedure after budget transfers prompt proposed change to Criminal Justice Commission
Summary
Vice Mayor Woodward and other commissioners pressed administration on procedural requirements after budget transfers appeared to reclassify the Criminal Justice Commission (CJC). Board postponed CJC-related items and approved ESS-related budget transfers; attorneys clarified department deletions must come before the board.
A procedural debate over whether the board had been bypassed on organizational changes prompted a vote to postpone certain items and a clarification from county legal staff.
Vice Mayor Woodward pulled a consent item (3X7) and said she had reviewed the charter and administrative code and believed departmental deletions or creation "has to come to the board to be approved." She cautioned that the agenda included only budget transfers and not a formal board agenda item to delete a department or reassign it. "All this item is a budget transfer that would make it so," she said, asking the county attorney to advise the board.
County Attorney advised that while the charter addresses the original 16 departments, the administrative code governs the creation or deletion of additional departments and that "the remedy here would just be to postpone the item and bring back the—an agenda item for the change of the department to delete the CJC," recommending the board consider the structural change directly.
The board followed that advice: members approved budget transfers related to ESS (parts of item 3X7) that the administrator said fell within her delegated authority, while postponing the parts related to deleting or reclassifying the Criminal Justice Commission so they could be considered together on a future agenda. The ESS-related transfers were approved 6–0; CJC-related parts were postponed 6–0.
Why it matters: Commissioners emphasized their duty to follow the administrative code (tied to the charter) and to maintain a paper trail of significant structural changes. Legal counsel highlighted the distinction between department changes (board approval required) and divisional reorganizations (administrator authority).
Next steps: Administration will return a formal agenda item if the board is asked to delete or reclassify the Criminal Justice Commission; meanwhile, ESS-related transfers proceed under the administrator’s authority.
