Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the City Hall Renovation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Alexandria BAR pauses final sign-off on City Hall renovations after hours of public comment
Summary
The Board of Architectural Review reviewed revised designs for the City Hall renovation—including Market Square shade structures, 5th‑floor glazing, hyphens (stair/elevator enclosures) and the central entry—and voted to continue the item to a future hearing to allow the design team to supply additional detailed drawings and staff to review finish/connection details.
The Alexandria Board of Architectural Review on Nov. 5 delayed final action on the City Hall renovation project at 301 King Street after more than two hours of public comment and detailed questioning from board members. Janine Kataub, assistant director for capital projects in the Department of General Services, and the design team presented refinements to four major elements: Market Square shade structures, the 5th‑floor glazing and its visibility from street intersections, the glazed hyphens that enclose stairs and elevators, and the three‑story central bay and entry.
Designer Irina (lead) outlined the changes: squared‑off metal canopies with a choice of stone bases (granite or Seneca red sandstone), aluminum panels with a fused film that can replicate a wood grain for durability, and a commitment to push glazing inboard so it remains hidden from key street sightlines. On the central bay, the team presented three material palettes and studies of an arched entry that would widen the center bay by roughly 1 foot 8 inches and alter its proportions.
Why it mattered: dozens of nearby residents, preservation groups and civic associations urged caution. Christine Roberts of the Historic Alexandria Foundation said the public had not received adequate notice of some new drawings shown tonight and urged the board to decline a certificate of appropriateness until details were settled. Speakers from the Historic Alexandria Resources Commission and multiple residents warned that glazed hyphens and a visible 5th‑floor rooftop space could introduce a new visual language that conflicts with surrounding historic fabric.
Board members split on details but reached consensus on process. Several members said chimneys should remain in the composition; others supported glass hyphens to distinguish new from old. Chair and staff repeatedly reminded the panel to frame their decision around the zoning ordinance standards (Section 10‑105 A2 A–J). The applicant described schedule pressures tied to moving City staff into temporary quarters and a contractor already engaged to meet an early‑January demolition target.
Outcome: the board voted to continue the matter to the next hearing so the applicant can provide clearer, close‑up drawings and staff can verify final material selections, sections of the hyphens, and entry details. The board did not approve or deny the COA tonight.
What happens next: the design team committed to continue working with staff and to produce additional renderings, sections and material samples. Staff said final approval is needed before the project can proceed to building‑permit submission and that the certificate of appropriateness is part of the permit path. If the board later approves the COA, the decision can still be appealed to City Council.
