Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Csam topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances bill to restore prosecutors' ability to charge passive depictions of minors in CSAM
Summary
H.R. 6715, the Child Predators Accountability Act, was advanced by the committee to clarify that passive depiction of a minor in explicit material qualifies as production of child sexual abuse material, a change supporters said is needed after certain appellate rulings narrowed the statute.
Representative Harris (North Carolina) introduced H.R. 6715, the Child Predators Accountability Act, saying a Seventh Circuit decision (United States v. Howard referenced) narrowed the statutory reach of Title 18 and could allow some predators to avoid prosecution where a child was not an active participant in a depiction. "My bill ... ensures that the term engaged in child [sexual] abuse material or CSAM encompasses passive activity when a child is portrayed in explicit images and videos," Harris said.
Committee response: Several members voiced support and noted the Howard decision’s legal implications; the ranking member associated with the committee record also said he would support the bill. The measure was presented as a narrow statutory clarification to preserve prosecutors' ability to pursue offenders who include minors in explicit visual depictions, regardless of whether the child actively participated.
Procedure and outcome: Representative Harris presented an amendment in the nature of a substitute described as a small, non-substantive short-title change; the amendment was adopted, and the committee voted to report the bill favorably to the House with two days to submit views and permission for staff to make technical conforming changes.
Next steps: H.R. 6715 will be reported to the House; sponsors said they expect the clarification to be important for prosecutions in circuits affected by the Howard ruling.
