Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Bel Air planning commission recommends less‑restrictive cannabis ordinance option to Town Board

January 09, 2026 | Bel Air, Harford County, Maryland


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Bel Air planning commission recommends less‑restrictive cannabis ordinance option to Town Board
The Bel Air Planning Commission recommended that the Town Board consider the less‑restrictive draft (Option 2) of a proposed ordinance to amend local development regulations for cannabis businesses, citing the need to align local code with recent changes in state law.

Planning staff told the commission that Senate Bill 215, enacted in April 2025 and effective July 2025, imposes new statewide rules for licensed dispensaries that include setbacks from certain sensitive uses (schools, licensed child‑care centers, playgrounds, libraries, parks and places of worship) and a minimum distance between dispensaries (a statutory framework that allows municipalities limited authority to adjust some distances up to specified limits). Staff said the statute also contains general language warning that a political subdivision may not adopt zoning requirements for licensed dispensaries that are more restrictive than those applied to retail dealers licensed under the alcoholic beverages article; that provision has created interpretive difficulty for local codes attempting to apply cannabis setbacks without also reworking longstanding liquor setbacks.

Commissioners discussed the consequences of strict interpretations—such as applying 500‑foot or 1,000‑foot buffers in a compact downtown—and whether applying cannabis setbacks to liquor retailers would create many nonconforming uses. Commissioners also discussed grandfathering existing uses, the treatment of large project areas (e.g., Hartford Mall treated as a single project area), and the need to coordinate on whether property‑line‑to‑property‑line measurements or project‑area approaches apply.

After discussion, a motion to recommend Option 2—the version described by staff as the least intrusive and which preserves existing liquor setbacks while applying the statutory cannabis buffers—passed with four ayes and one abstention. The commission asked staff to forward the recommendation and supporting materials to the Town Board for their consideration; staff noted the draft remained a first cut and that further legal review and public input were anticipated before any final town ordinance is adopted.

Next steps: staff will send the commission’s recommendation and the draft ordinance to the Town Board and continue to refine the draft in light of legal review and public feedback.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Maryland articles free in 2026

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI