The Charter Review Commission opened its meeting with a review of the Texas Open Meetings Act and reminders about proper communication among commissioners. Speaker 5, who led the overview, told the group that agendas are posted three business days in advance and cautioned that informal gatherings or chains of emails can create a prohibited forum: “To make things simple, any discussions happen here. Any questions, concerns, send it to me. I will then send it out to the commission,” Speaker 5 said.

The presenter covered common pitfalls the commission has flagged previously, including the risk that one-on-one replies can become a serial discussion involving a quorum. Commissioners asked how constituents should submit suggestions; Speaker 5 said members of the public may send comments to an individual commissioner but urged that any substantive suggestion be routed through staff so the commission receives identical materials and no accidental quorum forms.

Commissioners also discussed practical limits on post-meeting conversations and recess periods. Speaker 5 noted that during recess or after adjournment commissioners should not resume substantive business: “When the meeting is adjourned, we need to call it. Don’t [continue the business],” Speaker 5 said. The chair closed the public-comment portion and moved the meeting to the regular agenda.

Next steps: the commission accepted the staff reminders as guidance and proceeded to substantive charter items for attorney review and possible ballot referral.