Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tax Exchange topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
LAFCO outlines tax‑exchange process; Richards Ranch annexation remains in arbitration
Summary
Staff explained the multi‑step property tax exchange process used for annexations and said LAFCO remains a monitor until parties reach agreement or a final determination; the Richards Ranch application is currently in arbitration after mediation failed, and the developer urged the commission to intervene.
Santa Barbara Local Agency Formation Commission staff on Jan. 8 gave commissioners a detailed briefing on the property tax‑exchange process that must be completed before many annexations can move to a LAFCO hearing. The presentation included statutory timelines, the role of county offices, and dispute resolution steps.
Mike Prater, LAFCO’s executive officer, described the usual sequence: after a city files an annexation application LAFCO issues a report back that triggers the auditor/assessor to prepare a notice of tax estimates (a 45‑day step). That starts a negotiation period between the county and the annexing agency that runs 60 days and may be extended by mutual agreement for another 30 days. If no agreement is reached, the process can proceed to mediation and, subsequently, arbitration. “We are the entity that terminates ultimately that application,” Prater said, explaining that LAFCO resumes jurisdiction only if parties report a concluded agreement or a final determination that no agreement can be reached under the Cortese Knox Hertzberg Act.
Prater and counsel emphasized LAFCO’s limited role: the commission initiates and monitors the timeline but does not negotiate property‑tax exchange terms. If agencies cannot reach a tax‑exchange agreement, mediation or arbitration may follow; arbitration can be non‑binding in this context and the losing party may pursue further administrative findings or litigation.
The commission heard a recorded statement from Michael Solti, managing member for the Richards Ranch project, who said the annexation team has invested significant funds and that protracted negotiations have delayed the project. “We’ve invested well over $1,000,000,” Solti said, asking LAFCO to “weigh in” and expedite resolution.
Staff told commissioners they cannot take substantive action on the Richards Ranch application until either a tax exchange agreement is filed or LAFCO is notified that no agreement can be reached and the application is formally terminated. No vote or formal direction was taken at the meeting; staff will continue to monitor the mediation/arbitration process and notify the commission when the parties report an outcome.
Next procedural steps depend on the parties’ outcome: if agreement is reached the certificate of filing may be issued and the annexation can proceed to hearing; if not, LAFCO may terminate the application as provided by law.
