Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Funding Reallocation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee approves closing of fund-transfer file after housing dollars reallocated to wastewater project

Hawaii County Council Committee on Finance · December 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee voted to close a report on fund transfers after housing office staff said leftover home-program/CHDO funds, including a $450,000 item, are being combined and reallocated to the Oli Hikahi wastewater treatment-plant replacement project.

The Hawaii County Council Committee on Finance voted Dec. 16 to close its file on a report of fund transfers after housing staff said leftover home-program monies will be repurposed for a wastewater project.

Royce Teroma of the Office of Housing told the committee that one item in the controller's report — “the first amount, which is the 450,000 for the home projects” — and several smaller remaining balances are being consolidated. "All these, along with the other funding ... are all leftover monies that we are combining into 1 project, that we are funding for the, Oli Hikahi wastewater treatment, plant replacement," Teroma said.

Council members had asked whether a line labeled "Habitat for Humanity Affordable Homes for Puna" belonged to housing or public works. Teroma said the entries are from prior CHDO/home-program funding the county recovered and that staff plan to combine the residual amounts for the wastewater-plant replacement.

Council Member Inaba moved, and Council Member Eustace seconded, to close the file on communication 23.25. The clerk recorded eight members in favor; one member was excused. The motion carried.

The item was presented as an informational fund-transfer report from Controller John Arbels; the committee did not take additional action to appropriate new funds in the meeting record. Staff did not provide a full line-item breakdown during the discussion; several smaller dollar figures in the record were not spoken clearly and are recorded as presented in the report.