Board weighs Fort Wayne golf-course master plan and dog-park options amid environmental and neighborhood constraints

Bothell Parks and Recreation Board · January 7, 2026

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board discussion centered on master-planning the former Fort Wayne golf course (target January kickoff) and a lengthy debate over dog-park siting, with staff noting ecological constraints, water-utility ownership at William Penn, maintenance burdens and the possibility of pop-up trials or acquisition in Snohomish County.

At its Oct. 6 meeting the Bothell Parks and Recreation Board spent an extended portion of its agenda discussing options for the former Fort Wayne golf-course site and community demand for dog parks across the city. Staff said the Fort Wayne master-plan project is in preliminary logistics and that outreach is planned to begin in January; the work will include historical context, mapping of passive and active acres and public education about the site’s uses.

Why it matters: The former golf-course site is large and could reshape park access in parts of Bothell; decisions about active uses (such as dog parks), parking, and connectivity will affect neighbors and frequent park users.

Board members and staff described the difficulty of siting a dog park that both satisfies demand and avoids environmental or neighborhood harms. Staff noted that William Penn is not city-owned and sits above an aquifer; the land is owned by the water utility, creating permitting and environmental constraints. Staff and board members also cited examples of existing dog-park maintenance demands (Mary Moore includes a volunteer maintenance program) and said temporary pop-up dog parks can be trialed to test demand, while permanent dog parks require careful site analysis (parking, accessibility, ecological impact, animal-control input).

Some board members urged pursuing acquisition or cooperative planning with Snohomish County to address north-end park deficiencies, and others pointed to nearby cities (Kirkland) that began with temporary parks and later made them permanent after community validation. Board members emphasized that neighborhood opposition is common for in-park dog-park proposals and that outreach must account for both pro- and anti-dog-park sentiments. Staff said the PROS plan will include investigation of acquisition opportunities and a look at where new dog-park sites might be feasible in the long term.

What’s next: Staff will include dog-park considerations and site constraints in the PROS plan engagement and will bring site-analytics results to the board during the Fort Wayne master-plan process beginning in January. The board signaled support for further study and for testing temporary solutions where feasible.

Provenance: Topic introduced SEG 430; topic last discussed SEG 1746.